On 07/09/2011 07:10 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
another minor point: on successful recreation, the tgz.bak should be removed.
tgz.old, not .bak :-)
And I considered that. Tried to weigh the waste of disk space vs.
retaining the .old file as means of "easily" determining when (and even
what components) of the base-chroot was modified.
Of course, it was easier to not remove it, since doing so would have
required me to google the syntax for removing a file with python.
os.unlink(). Good; I learned something else today.
And what is that Larry Wall saying about lazy programmers ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
