On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:24:40PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
>On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:59:22 +0100, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote:
>> I am, yes. And advertising it to other people too! :-)
>
>Good to hear that. After a couple of years long hiatus, we are picking up speed
>again, so feel free to bother us with issues.

Cool. :-)

>> Which version did that feature go into? I don't see any mention of it
>> in the changelog or docs...
>
>A patch from 2001 made it into the code on 2009-08-16
>https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/commit/cde94e50
>
>Check offlineimap.conf for specifics :):
># The maximum size should be specified in bytes - e.g. 20000
># maxsize = 2000000
>
>It will simply treat larger messages as non-existent, so they will not
>show up on the other side.

Excellent, that's exactly how I wanted it. :-)

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                st...@einval.com
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
 English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on
 occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them
 unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."  -- James D. Nicoll




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to