On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:40:46PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Since I do not expect this to be fixed in Flash anytime soon, I am
> > reassigning this to libc.
> 
> No, this is a Flash bug.  The glibc bug you are looking for is Bug#625522.

I agree this is a flash bug. What I am saying is that this can be fixed
in glibc, and was actually fixed in:

http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518

> See /usr/share/doc/libc6/NEWS.Debian.gz for workarounds and
> https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-5739 for a binary patch.  If it
> is possible to work around this in the flashplugin-nonfree packaging,
> that would be a welcome thing.

I am aware of those workaround and patches, as mentionned in my previous
message. However, I believe it is technically illegal (at least outside
of Europe) to perform such workarounds, as stated in the Adobe EULAs:

"4.5 No Modification or Reverse Engineering. You shall not modify,
adapt, translate or create derivative works based upon the Software. You
shall not reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise attempt
to discover the source code of the Software. If you are located in the
European Union, please refer to the additional terms at the end of this
agreement under the header “European Union Provisions,” in Section 16."

I therefore think we should either wait for Adobe or for glibc to fix
this.

We could therefore marked 625522 as blocking this bug, for example.

A.

-- 
N'aimer qu'un seul est barbarie, car c'est au détriment de tous les
autres. Fût-ce l'amour de Dieu.
                        - Nietzsche, "Par delà le bien et le mal"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to