Hi Jonathan, On 2011-06-03 17:49:39 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: [...] > > Also, note that the C source was under NFS in both cases and was > > generated by a script just before the compilation. > > Thanks for a clear report. I suppose a diligent person should check > under what conditions fseek might have segfaulted so this seems > useful even without being reproducible. Still, it can't hurt to ask: > have you ever experienced something like this sense then? Maybe there > should be a binutils-dbg package to make a full backtrace easier to > acquire in cases like this one.
I have the same kind of programs (still under NFS and generated by a script) constantly running since 2006 on the same machines (including the one from which I reported the bug), and IIRC, I've no longer noticed this problem. But the machines themselves were upgraded, and the NFS server too. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
