On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:55:39PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:20:56 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > > >> If there are no objections, I'll reassign this bug to the FTP team on > > >> the weekend. > > > Hm, in #625230 (libfile-path-perl) we had a similar discussion, and > > > the conclusion there was to leave the package in unstable and the RC > > > bug open, until a new upstream release appears. > > Yes, I did see that one a few hours later. ExtUtils::Install has the > > additional fun of having patches applied in the perl package and not in > > libextutils-install-perl (#624508). > > Uh-oh. Thanks for the pointer. > > > > However we proceed, I'd suggest to do the same for both packages. And > > > I still slightly prefer to keep them, unless we know that there won't > > > be any new releases. > > We can keep libfile-path-perl and drop it if nothing changes until > > wheezy, but I would still like to either a, remove > > libextutils-install-perl or b, not have patches applied to it in both > > perl and the extra package (as we will forget to sync patches at some > > later point anyway). > > Agreed. > > > Given the package did not have a release on CPAN > > for almost two years, I would go with (a). > > Ok, I can't really find any good objections :)
+1 from me (if nothing else it makes reviewing the patch in the perl package less urgent, although it should still be done). Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
