On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:20:56 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > >> If there are no objections, I'll reassign this bug to the FTP team on > >> the weekend. > > Hm, in #625230 (libfile-path-perl) we had a similar discussion, and > > the conclusion there was to leave the package in unstable and the RC > > bug open, until a new upstream release appears. > Yes, I did see that one a few hours later. ExtUtils::Install has the > additional fun of having patches applied in the perl package and not in > libextutils-install-perl (#624508).
Uh-oh. Thanks for the pointer. > > However we proceed, I'd suggest to do the same for both packages. And > > I still slightly prefer to keep them, unless we know that there won't > > be any new releases. > We can keep libfile-path-perl and drop it if nothing changes until > wheezy, but I would still like to either a, remove > libextutils-install-perl or b, not have patches applied to it in both > perl and the extra package (as we will forget to sync patches at some > later point anyway). Agreed. > Given the package did not have a release on CPAN > for almost two years, I would go with (a). Ok, I can't really find any good objections :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Beatles
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
