On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:41, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:04:15PM -0500, Austin English wrote: >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 19:00, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker >> >> >> <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > I'm trying to launch this wine test from dlls/ntdll/tests/ >> >> >> > with ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M ntdll.dll -T ../../.. -p >> >> >> > and a git clone of the wine repo from today. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > And I get this result: "shift: 89: can't shift that many", which I >> >> >> > have >> >> >> > no clue what it's about. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > So I don't know how to reproduce. Any idea on how I should launch >> >> >> > that wine self test, or which mistake I may have made? >> >> >> >> >> >> do: >> >> >> $ ./configure && make >> >> >> >> >> >> as usual, then: >> >> >> $ cd dlls/ntdll/tests >> >> >> $ make exception.ok >> >> >> >> >> >> to repeat the test after success, 'rm exception.ok' or 'make >> >> >> testclean'. >> >> > >> >> > Cool, so I can reproduce: >> >> > >> >> > exception.c:1463: Tests skipped: child process not mapped at same >> >> > address (0x68758fe4/0x68753fe4) >> >> > >> >> > Do you know a kernel version that works with this test? >> >> >> >> Works on my gentoo machine, which has 2.6.37. Not sure what custom >> >> patches they're using though, off hand. >> >> You can see test results at http://test.winehq.org/data/. Using >> >> results from a few days ago: >> >> http://test.winehq.org/data/f555c2d8572b83595e5a9742ec4444c3ade17d3d/index_Wine.html >> >> >> >> I see it passes on another debian testing machine, though amd64: >> >> fg-deb64-win32 / >> >> http://test.winehq.org/data/6a3255bbbde0bdec3407ea89ef640b66dc45773c/wine_fg-deb64-win32/version.html >> >> / 2.6.38-2-amd64 / >> >> http://test.winehq.org/data/6a3255bbbde0bdec3407ea89ef640b66dc45773c/wine_fg-deb64-win32/ntdll:exception.html >> >> >> >> I don't know of a version in debian 32-bit that passes. If there are >> >> some old .deb's you'd like me to test, let me know. >> > >> > Hmm, doesn't work for me with amd64 on 2.6.37 (my previous test was >> > 2.6.38.5 on amd64): >> > >> > exception.c:1463: Tests skipped: child process not mapped at same >> > address (0x68758fe4/0x68753fe4) >> > >> > So may be it depends on the config. Or on something else than the kernel. >> > >> > Lemme check with an oldy like 2.6.32 >> >> Fails for me with >> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110505T002605Z/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686_2.6.32-34_i386.deb > > Same for me, amd64. > > It seems not adapted to 64 bits in fact. > The part that complains is in an "#ifdef __i386__", and there > is an alternate __x86_64__ section. It seems the section that has been > compiled is the i386 even if I'm running amd64, which may be the > cause of the issue. > > So the problem appears to be more in the test implementation of wine.
Unless you configured wine with --enable-win64 when building, wine is being compiled as a 32-bit application. Though I'm more worried about the i386 case failing :). -- -Austin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
