On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:16:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 18:08, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:01:28PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:55, Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'm trying to launch this wine test from dlls/ntdll/tests/
> >> > with ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M ntdll.dll -T ../../.. -p
> >> > and a git clone of the wine repo from today.
> >> >
> >> > And I get this result: "shift: 89: can't shift that many", which I have
> >> > no clue what it's about.
> >> >
> >> > So I don't know how to reproduce. Any idea on how I should launch
> >> > that wine self test, or which mistake I may have made?
> >>
> >> do:
> >> $ ./configure && make
> >>
> >> as usual, then:
> >> $ cd dlls/ntdll/tests
> >> $ make exception.ok
> >>
> >> to repeat the test after success, 'rm exception.ok' or 'make testclean'.
> >
> > Cool, so I can reproduce:
> >
> > exception.c:1463: Tests skipped: child process not mapped at same address
> > (0x68758fe4/0x68753fe4)
> >
> > Do you know a kernel version that works with this test?
>
> Works on my gentoo machine, which has 2.6.37. Not sure what custom
> patches they're using though, off hand.
> You can see test results at http://test.winehq.org/data/. Using
> results from a few days ago:
> http://test.winehq.org/data/f555c2d8572b83595e5a9742ec4444c3ade17d3d/index_Wine.html
>
> I see it passes on another debian testing machine, though amd64:
> fg-deb64-win32 /
> http://test.winehq.org/data/6a3255bbbde0bdec3407ea89ef640b66dc45773c/wine_fg-deb64-win32/version.html
> / 2.6.38-2-amd64 /
> http://test.winehq.org/data/6a3255bbbde0bdec3407ea89ef640b66dc45773c/wine_fg-deb64-win32/ntdll:exception.html
>
> I don't know of a version in debian 32-bit that passes. If there are
> some old .deb's you'd like me to test, let me know.
Hmm, doesn't work for me with amd64 on 2.6.37 (my previous test was 2.6.38.5 on
amd64):
exception.c:1463: Tests skipped: child process not mapped at same
address (0x68758fe4/0x68753fe4)
So may be it depends on the config. Or on something else than the kernel.
Lemme check with an oldy like 2.6.32
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
