On Tue, 10 May 2011, Hector Oron wrote: > The patch was wrong. Not only because it was missing then in the if > clause, but also the check does not seem to work properly. Here there > is an updated and tested patch:
The patch does not match the equivalent test for __ARM_EABI__ a few lines above. Do you really need to use the -dM gcc option? It might not be as portable or something. If you change the patch, please retest. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
