On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 11:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Ian, should we apply the backport from > > > > 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et > > > > al? > > > > > > It's already in SVN for 2.6.32-34, seems to be in the changelog twice > > > even, once closing #614400 and then again closing #613634, which are > > > merged. > > > > Oh right, it's applied to the xen-featureset kernels. > > So it is, I'd forgotten that. > > > But isn't it also > > applicable to non-xen-featureset kernels which can run in domU? > > Yes. I initially confused it with the vmalloc_sync_all fixes which > really only impact domains running backend drivers (since that's the > only real user of that code path). The vunmap thing is indeed more > generically useful to fix so I think it should go into the generic > flavours too. > > Want me to take a look at that?
I'll check this in to svn shortly for 2.6.32-35. Unfortunately I missed the 2.6.32-34 boat. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Gojira - Ocean Planet Isn't air travel wonderful? Breakfast in London, dinner in New York, luggage in Brazil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
