On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:46:05 +0900
Hiroyuki Yamamoto <hir...@kcn.ne.jp> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:52:54 +0900
> d+sylph...@vdr.jp wrote:
> 
> > > It seems that everyone crashed at the same point:
> > > summaryview.c: summary_show_queued_msgs() -> summary_status_show()
> > > 
> > > The GtkTreeStore iterator somehow became invalid there.
> > > I haven't figure out the reason yet.
> > 
> > Yeah, yesterday I reproduced it.  While I opened some folder,
> > I sent test mail that filtered to there, sylpheed always crashed.
> > But today I could not reproduce it by same way.
> > I did not change any settings.  It is very strange.
> 
> It seems that I have found the cause of problem.
> Please try the attached patch to see it fixes the crash.
> 

The patch seems to be working so far. In two days I couldn't get
sylpheed to crash anymore (using a recent svn checkout with this change
in it already).

Hiro-san, am I right that this change may defer sorting messages to
after all messages are downloaded? I can see that new messages are
moved to a certain folder due to filter rules but not reordered until
all the downloads complete. Totally acceptable BTW.

Maybe it has always been that way but I am noticing only now, if so,
sorry for the noise.

Thanks and Regards,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Attachment: pgpFdvDowaP6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to