2011/1/11 Robert Luberda <rob...@debian.org>:
> On 07.01.2011 22:28, Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> Anyway, I think in case of fcitx package, it should probably register
> the text documents in 3 different doc-base files, but honestly I'm under
> impression that the documentation is useful for the package developers
> only, but I might be wrong, especially because I don't understand
> Chinese at all. Also in my opinion the Abstract (`describes what fcitx
> is and how it can be used.') and Section ('Help/Books') fields should be
> also changed to something more appropriate.
>To be honest, I don't see the necessity to register those fcitx documentations to doc-base, resons: 1. Users and developers who are interested in fcitx are required to have an X11 environment (fcitx is a X input toy). If so, I think nearly all of them will find the documentations themselves and open them with a browser (or text editor) to view them (see 2 for reason). 2. Registering to doc-base won't benefit users of Yelp or something in same category. 3. Documentations about how to use doc-base is not so good, or we won't be dealing with this problem now. 4. The reason why I register them is to make lintian calm. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
