On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 14:34 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On 14 December 2010 at 20:12, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > | On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 12:39 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > reassign 605372 release.debian.org > | > thanks > | > | [For reference, at least right now debian-release has only received the > | result of your control@ mail, not the mail I'm replying to; it's > | generally a good idea to CC the receiving package] > > [ I was thinking about that but then I didn't know the email handle of the > virtual BTS entity release.debian.org -- the release list ? ]
Yep. release.debian....@packages.d.o works too :-) > | > Dear release team, > | > > | > Can you please schedule a binary-only rebuild of package > | > > | > quadprog (binary: r-cran-quadprog) > | > > | > on the 'armel' architecture, and once completed, schedule a binary-only > | > rebuild of package > | > > | > tseries (binary: r-cran-tseries) fwiw, this will be a give-back rather than a binNMU, as the package has not successfully built yet. > | > on the 'armel' architecture. [...] > | dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: couldn't find library libRblas.so needed by > debian/r-cran-quadprog/usr/lib/R/site-library/quadprog/libs/quadprog.so (ELF > format: 'elf32-littlearm'; RPATH: ''). > > libRblas is outdated by years. We used it when we had lapack 3.1.* years, > and for several years have used Debian's BLAS and LAPACK meaning that R's > linRblas is no longer built. It's still in the r-base-core-ra armel binary package, hence my mentioning it :-) In any case, looking at the relative build dates of the previously successful quadprog and tseries builds on armel, I've concluded I may have been overly hasty in deciding that a binNMU wouldn't help, so I've scheduled quadprog/armel. Assuming the log for that looks happier I'll give-back tseries afterwards. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
