On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 12:39 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> reassign 605372 release.debian.org
> thanks
[For reference, at least right now debian-release has only received the
result of your control@ mail, not the mail I'm replying to; it's
generally a good idea to CC the receiving package]
> Dear release team,
>
> Can you please schedule a binary-only rebuild of package
>
> quadprog (binary: r-cran-quadprog)
>
> on the 'armel' architecture, and once completed, schedule a binary-only
> rebuild of package
>
> tseries (binary: r-cran-tseries)
>
> on the 'armel' architecture.
Looking through the bug log, I'm not convinced that this will help. The
tseries build fails with:
| unable to load shared object
'/usr/lib/R/site-library/quadprog/libs/quadprog.so':
| libRblas.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
and the quadprog build log on armel predictably contains:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: couldn't find library libRblas.so needed by
debian/r-cran-quadprog/usr/lib/R/site-library/quadprog/libs/quadprog.so (ELF
format: 'elf32-littlearm'; RPATH: '').
libRblas.so comes from r-base-core-ra (on armel), which wasn't installed
as part of the quadprog build on armel. In fact, so far as I can see,
r-base-core-ra is a completely leaf package, with no reverse
{build-,}dependencies so there's no indication in the packaging that
it's intended to be installed whilst building quadprog.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
