OK, my understanding from the discussion with upstream is that 0.27 is the unstable lead-up to a stable 0.28. For 0.28, the library and gir names will remain as they are in 0.27 (libvte.so.9/libvte2_90.so.9 and Vte-0.0.gir/Vte-2.90.gir).
Eventually vte will reach 1.0 and those gtk3 names will change to the much more reasonable names libvte-3.0.so and Vte-3.0.gir. If they still care about gtk2 at that point, the names for those will be libvte.so.9 (presumably) and Vte-1.0.gir. Since 0.28 will be the version for GNOME3 and upstream could not give an ETA for 1.0, we're stuck with these names for a little while. So, then I think my packaging gets the major names right: gir1.0-vte-0.0 gir1.0-vte-2.90 libvte9 libvte-2.90-9 libvte-dev libvte-2.90-dev So the only change in terms of names from my original patch is to drop the libvte-bin package? -- mterry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
