On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 21:27 +0000, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Ugh. I wonder why upstream is using that name and not libvte3.so.N or
> whatever.
> It sounds like they will change when they release an stable version, which
> doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Can you check this with upstream?
I sent an email to upstream and CC'd you on it.
> > * Adds gir packages for both libraries
> > * Moves executable to new libvte-bin package
>
> That's not really needed. The executables are in libexecdir, so just build
> the
> gtk+3 version with a different libexecdir, i.e. from debian/rules:
Well, the only executable is /usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper which
only has the following library dependencies:
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff27b2e000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f9faaaa9000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f9faa726000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f9faacd4000)
So I didn't think there was a point to building two versions as it
doesn't depend on vte itself. And thus, I felt like it should live
apart from the library in bin package.
--
mterry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
