Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader
LILO"):
> Is there any objection to starting the voting process on this issue
> with the options presented in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886#55 ?
No, I don't think so. There's nothing more to be said.
> [for reference:
>
> A. lilo should be removed. In the meantime, William is to be sole
> maintainer of lilo. His promised request to the ftp team to
> remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
>
> B. lilo should be retained in unstable. Matt and Joachim are to be
> joint maintainers of lilo.
I vote:
1: A
2: B
3: SQ
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
