Ian Jackson writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> No, I don't think so. There's nothing more to be said.
>
> > [for reference:
> >
> > A. lilo should be removed. In the meantime, William is to be sole
> > maintainer of lilo. His promised request to the ftp team to
> > remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> > not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> >
> > B. lilo should be retained in unstable. Matt and Joachim are to be
> > joint maintainers of lilo.
...
> I vote:
I'm changing my vote as follows:
1: B
2: A
3: SQ
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
