On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 23:00, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > <h...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote: > >> Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve > >> patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found > >> them prepared for 2.4.4 here: > > > > Unless one of the other Cyrus maintainers overrides me, those will be > > added only after they get merged upstream. > > That won't be me. I'm with hmh on that issue. I consider those patches > too invasive to be included in stock Debian installation (no need to > argue with me).
Two votes against, then. That said, it *is* being merged upstream, but I understand there are a few problems still, and it might end up being targeted to a future 2.5 branch. I *really* don't want to ever deal with bugs about bad interaction of those patches and a murder cluster that uses online replication... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
