On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 20:21, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Costin Gusa wrote: >> It's almost a year since last message on this list, squeeze is frozen, >> cyrus stable is already 2.4.4. > > 2.4.4 is in experimental. > >> Sadly, this makes me wonder not if we will see cyrus-2.3 in >> testing/experimental, but if we EVER will have a modern cyrus back in > > No, we have decided to skip 2.3 entirely. I am not junking the 2.3.16 > packages until I move production to 2.4 (which I won't do until 2.4 is a lot > more stable), so either I or someone else might decide to maintain 2.3, and > bring the "upload 2.3 to unstable" issue back to the table. > > But neither 2.3 or 2.4 are going in for squeeze, except as a > (fully-supported) backports later on (I for one will need it). >
Thank you for the update. Actually I have sent the question without checking pkg-cyrus-imapd-debian-devel@ first, which would have given me the answer :) As long as we have something newer, it's fine. Probably the OP wanted the same thing at the moment of creating the bug and not necessarily a specific version. Is it ok to ask here about including uoa.gr autocreate/autosieve patches or should I file a bug against the newly 2.4.4? (I just found them prepared for 2.4.4 here: http://www.vx.sk/download/patches/cyrus-imapd/) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
