On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > It’s usually preferred to only package released tarballs, so once you > have published a new snapshot, drop me a line so I can update the > package. > > Once an updated package is ready, I’ll need to have Dmitry and Hannes > test it and confirm whether the bug is gone. If that is the case, we might > be able to get a freeze exception. > > In fact, the package in Debian is so outdated only because squeeze froze > just a few days before my sponsor had a chance to upload 0.9.25.
Marco has released 0.9.27, and I have updated the Debian packaging. Dmitry and Hannes, please test this release and let me know if it fixes the bug for you. I have prepared a binary package for i386[1], and of course the source package[2] is available as well. I am unable to build amd64 packages since I don’t own any 64–bit machine yet. Unfortunately, I see now that the unblock policy has been recently made more strict[3], and new versions are allowed only if the package has RC severity, so this release will be targeted at Squeeze+1 in any case. [1] http://alioth.debian.org/~ab-guest/scrotwm_0.9.27.orig.tar.gz [2] http://alioth.debian.org/~ab-guest/scrotwm_0.9.27-1.dsc [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/10/msg00002.html -- Andrea Bolognani <e...@kiyuko.org> Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
