Hi,

Cyril Brulebois writes:


[...]

>> In the meantime, I will be setting the priority to whishlist, if you
>> don't have any objection, but it will remain open in the case that
>> there's other people wanting to express their opinion.
>
> I'd call it a pretty serious bug for a library to eat that much disc
> space. (Even the kernel is smaller!) Particularly when it used to be
> much lighter, I'm calling that a regression.

It was that light on amd64, but on the most popular platform, i386, it
has always been that large and nobody argued before. Check, for example,
lenny's version

http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libopenscenegraph7

> Not sure what release managers would think about:
>  - providing a way to get a smaller library (be it by splitting or by
>    providing users with two flavours of the library),

I think the key point is not that we are doing things differently, but
doing the same we did for the most popular platform since several years ago.

> 
>  - or revert the Introspection entirely.

Anyway next OSG release won't bundle osgIntrospection anymore, so in the
future, it will be a package on its own.

Regards,

Alberto



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to