Hi, Cyril Brulebois writes:
[...] >> In the meantime, I will be setting the priority to whishlist, if you >> don't have any objection, but it will remain open in the case that >> there's other people wanting to express their opinion. > > I'd call it a pretty serious bug for a library to eat that much disc > space. (Even the kernel is smaller!) Particularly when it used to be > much lighter, I'm calling that a regression. It was that light on amd64, but on the most popular platform, i386, it has always been that large and nobody argued before. Check, for example, lenny's version http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libopenscenegraph7 > Not sure what release managers would think about: > - providing a way to get a smaller library (be it by splitting or by > providing users with two flavours of the library), I think the key point is not that we are doing things differently, but doing the same we did for the most popular platform since several years ago. > > - or revert the Introspection entirely. Anyway next OSG release won't bundle osgIntrospection anymore, so in the future, it will be a package on its own. Regards, Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
