also sprach Christoph Anton Mitterer <cales...@scientia.net> [2010.08.04.0126 
+0200]:
> I fully agree with Martin. This package is inherently insecure and I see
> no good reason why this is being distributed.
> I guess it's rather dangerous for end-users.
> 
> Have there been any discussion on it's removal?

No, but we can repurpose this bug against ftp.debian.org. I just
wonder why Mako doesn't reply.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"fools ignore complexity. pragmatics suffer it.
 some can avoid it. geniuses remove it."
                                                      -- alan perlis

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply via email to