On 27 July 2010 16:18, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote: > What make me a bit unhappy about that is uscan will again show us > 1.230 if they are in the same directory (and use the same > filename/versioning scheme).
I'll talk to upstream about maybe rearranging things so that the tools can distinguish between unstable and stable. > And 1.230 is not yet in testing, so we now have an unstable version > in unstable :) If we package their unstable branch, I think it should be in experimental. If I understand the system correctly, upstream's unstable is head, and they cherry-pick patches into stable. > Either that, or use 1:1.230+is+really+1.220-1. That would confuse everyone, IMHO. Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
