On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 14:19:48 -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > As you can see, that was just additional information as in "me > too". AFAIK, the original bug report was for Intel and there was also > reports for radeon. > Ah, right, didn't notice that. These might still be different bugs, though.
Running valgrind under X should work, although it'll probably be dead slow. X keeps track of what client allocated which resources, and should free them when that client dies. Due to fragmentation this may or may not show up in the reported RSS. And due to bugs this may or may not actually happen... Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
