Hi, On 10/06/10 20:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > From the release side, I think I'd mentally filed this under "waiting > for feedback from the gpxviewer maintainer(s)". If they're ok with it > then I don't see any particular problems; note that if they happen to > intersect with the Python transition then the packages may get blocked > in unstable until python is ready to transition.
Sorry, didn't realise that I needed to reply. I can't see any problems apart from those depreciation warnings, and work has already started upstream to fix gpxviewer for the new API version. Regards, Andrew Gee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
