Hi, On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 20:32 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:31:41 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:46:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > > The package does actually have one reverse dependency - gpxviewer, which > > > uses the Python bindings. > > > > Oops, I missed to check those. Yes, you're right. I'm CCing the gpxviewer > > maintainer. [...] > > The only thing happening is some more output on the console, with the > > deprecation warnings. Otherwise, gpxviewer works fine. > > > > [..] > > Any news for this transition?
>From the release side, I think I'd mentally filed this under "waiting for feedback from the gpxviewer maintainer(s)". If they're ok with it then I don't see any particular problems; note that if they happen to intersect with the Python transition then the packages may get blocked in unstable until python is ready to transition. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
