On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ulises Vitulli <der...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 09/06/10 19:19, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System < > ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: > >> * Enhance ntpd.conf manpage to verbosely remember we don't listen to any >> by default (Closes: #575705). >> > > That change has little relation to this bug report. I wanted to explicitly > say _what_ we listen for, not that we don't listen by default. > > Besides, with your change there now are two almost identical sentences > saying > "OpenNTPd on Debian *does not listen* on any address" > inside the "listen on address" description inside "man ntpd.conf". > > Regards, Thue > > Hi Thue Janus Kristensen! > > I don't really follow what you're trying to mean... If It says "does not > listen on any", could it be grammatically possible that "there are some > that do listen" ? > Your formulation is fine. I merely suggest that the same statement is not repeated twice within 5 lines. :) > > Sorry if I misunderstood the first bug report, I offer my apologizes and I > kindly request you to tell me what would you like the manpage to say > instead. > I suggested a formulation for the man page in the initial bug report; see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575705 > > > Greetings, > > Dererk > Regards, Thue
