tag 307819 - pending fixed-upstream
severity 307819 wishlist
thanks

Re: Antonio Radici 2009-06-17 <4a395387.3060...@dyne.org>
> Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > Yes. It is. It is that hard issue that without patching that crap out of
> > mutt I would not use it at all. (As I told I always patch it and compile
> > my own version locally. The patch is taken from a very very old debian
> > release I think around 2004. But the patch is still fine (with some
> > small merging issues).)
> 
> Ok I understand, it not useful to follow up upstream because they already told
> us their decision, I have your patch and it is very simple, I will discuss 
> with
> Christoph and see if we can integrate it. I agree with the fact that this 
> should
> be configurable (even if the default is UTF-8)

Upstream seems unwilling to implement this, and I'm not really
enthusiastic about it either.

Antonio: if you like (and hopefully understand :) the patch, add it.
(I won't.)

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to