On 26.05.10 Alexey Salmin (alexey.sal...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi,
> Should't this dependency be shown in package dependencies > not matter how strict or necessary it is? > Luatex package explicetly depends on zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) > so this implicit dependency on 1.2.3.4 breaks system upgrade: > Well, the dep (>= 1:1.1.4) is declared by the zlib1g package itself, i.e. we just build using the zlib1g-dev package and the dep is created by itself. We could introduce a conflict against a to new zlib1g or we could loosen the dep in the source code of luatex itself (a similar thing was done before). Or we could simply wait until 1.2.5 is in unstable and then re-upload luatex. People running packages from experimental should expect system breakages. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
