PS: I've just checked the packages in the ruby-pkg-extras repository and found at least 2 packages where it seems, that the maintainer used svn-buildpackage 0.8.0 and tagged a wrong revision:
May be this gives my point of view, that the tagging behaviour with "-rBASE" is a problem, a little bit more weight :-) $ export tags=svn+alioth://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ruby-extras/tags $ svn cat $tags/libbarby-ruby/0.3.2-1/debian/changelog | head -n1 libbarby-ruby (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low # 0.3.2-1 != 0.3-1 $ svn cat $tags/libhaml-ruby/2.2.23-1/debian/changelog | head -n1 libhaml-ruby (2.2.22-1) unstable; urgency=low $ svn cat $tags/libhaml-ruby/2.2.24-1/debian/changelog | head -n1 libhaml-ruby (2.2.23-1) unstable; urgency=low There might be more packages with wrong tags, but it's hard to find them. Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
