Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 15 April 2010 22:27, Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at> wrote: >> Reuben Thomas wrote: >>> [4. Why are we still shipping cron, when fcron has been apparently >>> capable and planned to take over from cron+anacron for years (and can >>> already be used in place of anacron)?] >> Probably because it's ubiquitous, present (in various flavors) on BSD >> and Linux distributions alike. > > What I really mean is, why are we still shipping cron as the default > cron daemon? As I say, there has been a plan to ship fcron as the > default for some time. (Not sure where I actually read that now, maybe > said plan has been abandoned...)
I am unaware of any such plan in the past or present, but then again, I only recently came on board as a maintainer. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
