On 15 April 2010 22:27, Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at> wrote: > Reuben Thomas wrote: >> [4. Why are we still shipping cron, when fcron has been apparently >> capable and planned to take over from cron+anacron for years (and can >> already be used in place of anacron)?] > > Probably because it's ubiquitous, present (in various flavors) on BSD > and Linux distributions alike.
What I really mean is, why are we still shipping cron as the default cron daemon? As I say, there has been a plan to ship fcron as the default for some time. (Not sure where I actually read that now, maybe said plan has been abandoned...) -- http://rrt.sc3d.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
