On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:48:32PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Julian Gilbey <j...@polya.uklinux.net> writes: > > > > > No, it was compilation problems, which I think are to do with the > > > kernel-headers common package business. Indeed, I forgot to attach the > > > log - attached this time! > > > > This is some other problem, given that nvidia builds fine for me against > > the same kernel but on i386 (I don't have an amd64 system with the > > relevant hardware, although I can try a build on one later anyway). > > [...] > > Does your /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-3-amd64/include/linux/version.h > > file not have that define? > > My bad. It turns out that 195.36.15 is completely broken upstream; I > have no clue how they get it to compile.
I can try and have a look at it. I was trying to see how to best get 2.6.33 supported yesterday (although I didn't finish yet). -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
