reassign 573160 maint-guide retitle 573160 update document in line with new dpkg "3.0 (quilt)" thanks
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:39:56PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > If you have good "3.0 (quilt)" example with patches to replace dpatch > > section, I think we can make "3.0 (quilt)" more popular. > > Define "good". I mean the quilt handling is now done by dpkg-source so > the source package doesn't contain any quilt logic (so it can't be good or > bad). I meant that "good" as good example to use "3.0 (quilt)" format with multiple patches. > Some "3.0 (quilt)" packages with patches: quilt, ftplib, libxml-mini-perl I will study them .... > > The following needs updates. > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-build.en.html#s-dpatch > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ap-pkg-eg.en.html#s-pkg-dpatch > > Many things need an update indeed. Also -i -I are not needed anymore with > 3.0 source packages, they are implicit by default. Oh, I was thiking of them too. But new handling in debian directory in original tar ball may needs to be documented too. > "If package version is not at -0 or -1 Debian revision, you must provide > dpkg-buildpackage command with the "-sa" option" > > That's also outdated, -sa is needed if the last changelog entry is not the > first one for the given upstream version. I see. > > I do not think we need to advocate dpatch anymore. > > Agreed. > > > PS: Now discussion is more about maint-guide. dh-make seems to be > > fixed for debhelper version issue. > > Reassign the bug? I did since Craig has updated debhelper version put by his package. So no point keeping here. I CCed him so he will not close this bug accidentally. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
