On Sunday 07 March 2010 20:15:53, Éric Araujo wrote: > Hello Hello,
> Could you forward the bug upstream? (I checked on launchpad.net, since > Wicd’s sourceforge page tells development happens there, and didn’t > found this bug/request.) Upstream could then choose to include my 5-line > patch or depend on iniparse, to the benefit of all users. Using iniparse is not that simple -- see my bug closing and then reopening. Also, upstream is not doing any work on 1.7 anymore, unless serious bugs pop up. Thus, forwarding the bug upstream doesn't make much sense. I prefer keeping a patch in the Debian package (and will work on that as soon as I get some spare time), and then port it to the new 2.0 code, when it'll be released. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
