Heya, Gerrit Jan Baarda <gjbaa...@xs4all.nl> (17/02/2010): > I found a very similar bugreport on the freedesktop bugzilla and > added my own information, see > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24857. Does it still > make sense to create a bugreport against the debian > xserver-xorg-video- radeon and/or libdrm-radeon1 packages?
I don't think so. What one really needs is to get it fixed upstream, and if there's a bugreport there already, I think we're good. I'll probably -done this bug with the appropriate package & version once the fix flows in Debian. > Well, the current blender 2.5 is an alpha-0 version after all. It is > quite usable, but at the same time it is far from stable and has > missing stuff when compared to 2.49b. So also from that perspective > I don't think it is ready enough. As I understand there will be > another alpha in the coming weeks and then after some time a proper > release ( http://www.blendernation.com/blender- > developer-meeting-minutes-february-14-2010 ). The first 'proper' > blender with the new codebase is supposed to be finished by the > middle of this year. > > Maybe it is a good idea to wait for the first beta before moving to > unstable and hope that the X situation has improved by then... I've been thinking about that over night, and I'd tend to agree with you; I'll probably keep it in experimental until at least the next alpha release. Many thanks for underlining the fact you have some stability and regression issues. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
