On 02/01/2010 11:39 AM, The Anarcat wrote: > The situation with drush 2.1 is a bit uncertain at this point. The > release was really broken when working with non-bash shells and didn't > work in Debian squeeze or Ubuntu out of the box. I would have had to > backport a few patches to make it work and never found the time.
ah, ok, thanks for the info, i hadn't realized this. > I'm now rather considering uploading the latest 3.0-alpha1 to > experimental, what do you think of this idea? > > 3.0-rc1, once it's released, would be the version I would push into sid > and therefore the 3.0 branch would be the officially supported debian > version. > > See also http://drupal.org/node/682644 and > http://drupal.org/node/461488#comment-2543036 Thanks for these pointers. They explain the situation quite well, and i'm satisfied with your arguments for waiting on 3.0-rc1. If your packaging work involves putting together preliminary packages for the alphas and betas, you could consider putting them in experimental (as opposed to unstable) until rc1 drops. I don't mean to create more work for you, of course -- only do that if you think (a) it would help you get the feedback you need, and (b) it doesn't waste a lot of your time on the debian packaging. I'll leave this bug open so that other folks can find the information via the debian BTS. Feel free to close it with your package of 3.0-rc1 once that happens. Thanks again for your work on this! --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
