David Paleino wrote: > On Friday 08 January 2010 21:15:29, Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2010-01-08 20:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 20:23:59 +0100, David Paleino wrote: >>>> reassign 564254 bash-completion >>>> retitle 564254 add proper Conflicts: with older bash versions >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> On Friday 08 January 2010 19:46:44, David Paleino wrote: >>>>> reassign 564254 bash >>>>> retitle 564254 shouldn't ship bash_completion >>>>> thanks >>>> bash-completion has proper Replaces/Depends, but it's missing also a >>>> Conflicts on older bash versions, which I believe is needed. Going to >>>> fix it, and sorry for the mess! >>> Why do you think Conflicts are needed? I'm pretty sure Conflicts would >>> be wrong. >> Yes, and it would not even help. The right thing¹ is to make the >> Replaces unversioned, AFAICS. > > Why? :)
Because the conffile is still part of bash according to dpkg AFAICT. Versioned Replaces are strange anyway, a Replaces only tells that this package is allowed to override files of the mentioned other package... >> Unversioned Replaces are not pretty, but I don't see a better idea. > > I won't put a Replaces: bash, that's pretty weird. On the contrary, versioned Replaces look weird to me. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
