On 03.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On So, 03 Jan 2010, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > In TL 2007 we had:
> >
> > * make texlive-latex-recommended provide latex-ucs-uninames, latex-ucs,
> > latex-ucs-contrib as these Debian packages have been given up for
> > adoption
> >
> > Should we reintroduce this (this time with texlive-latex-extra) to
> > minimize impact? The B-Ds have to be fixed anyway?
>
> No. Impossible. We cannot do
> texlive-latex-recommended provides texlive-latex-extra
> because it does NOT provide all functionality there is in -latex-extra.
> That was only possible because we fully took over functionality from
> *ucs*.
>
I meant "texlive-latex-extra provides latex-ucs etc.". Yes that won't
fix thew FTBFS in this case, the BD has to be fixed anyway.
H.
--
Alas, how love can trifle with itself!
-- William Shakespeare, "The Two Gentlemen of Verona"
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
