On 01.01.2010 23:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:28:36PM +0100, Michał wrote:
On 18.12.2009 06:36, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:48:53PM +0100, Michał wrote:
no, it is fresh system.
smbclient -N -L 192.168.1.104/nin
This is not a valid smbclient commandline; the supported argument to '-L' is
a host, not a share. What is it you expect this command to do?
As fornautilus and dolphin, these programs use libsmbclient, not smbclient;
and there are confirmed reports of regressions in this version of
libsmbclient that are expected to be fixed in the next upstream release -
regressions that do not affect smbclient itself.
So after I have checked this new next release I thing this bug may
be closed.:)
Which new version did you check? Was this 2:3.4.3-2 in unstable/testing, or
a new upstream version of samba?
I mean: when I check and find this bug solved. Sorry, it was late and my
thoughts were somewhere else. I send my results as soon as it is possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Czy w Nowym Roku odnajde prawdziwa milosc?
Zapytaj wrozke >> http://link.interia.pl/f2559
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
