Hi, On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:28:36PM +0100, Michał wrote: > On 18.12.2009 06:36, Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:48:53PM +0100, Michał wrote: > >>no, it is fresh system. > >>smbclient -N -L 192.168.1.104/nin > >This is not a valid smbclient commandline; the supported argument to '-L' is > >a host, not a share. What is it you expect this command to do?
> >As for nautilus and dolphin, these programs use libsmbclient, not smbclient; > >and there are confirmed reports of regressions in this version of > >libsmbclient that are expected to be fixed in the next upstream release - > >regressions that do not affect smbclient itself. > So after I have checked this new next release I thing this bug may > be closed.:) Which new version did you check? Was this 2:3.4.3-2 in unstable/testing, or a new upstream version of samba? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
