Filippo Giunchedi dixit: >thanks for your effort, it is much appreciated!
Thanks. >My concern is that the NMU fixes too much things which are out of scope That was one of the things I was not too sure about. On the other hand, lintian warnings (some of them!) will prevent uploads, so I eventually thought it’s better to fix more than less things. >(assuming the scope was fixing the RC bug). No, scope was fixing “some” bugs for T&S 1 ☺ I picked packages at random. >Regarding the fix I'm not convinced attaching the config.h.in and configure >diff is a good idea, running autoheader/autoconf at build time sounds better >to me. That’s the other thing I was not too sure about. Since you are “in” already, there need not be an NMU, and we can work on this together, or you can just take my patches and apply and make a new regular Debian upload. I did mail the fixes to upstream too, btw. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
