On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:40:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the late answer. > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:00:59PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > > Package: iceweasel > > Version: 2.0.0.3-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > It is perfectly legitimate to allow people to scale a small amount of > > text on a paper. In my case, I have a small number of kanjis that I > > would print as large as possible - 1000% would be enough for this > > particular need, but it could be useful to allow the user to take full > > advantage of the size of the integer used to store that value ? > > 1000 is the maximum you can now get in version 3.x. Would you agree this > is enough ?
Well, it would have been OK for that particular use, but is it really useful at all to have a limit (leaving aside the fact that the GtkSpinbox requires an upper limit when given a lower one, which is IMHO a bug in its own right) ? I mean, there will surely be someone one day with a need for a (slightly ?) larger scale factor... is there a real reason to forbid it ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
