severity 562797 normal thanks On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:16:38AM -0500, James Vega wrote: > Neither safe-upgrade nor full-upgrade (the difference shouldn't matter > for this case) will choose to upgrade librdf0, in the process removing > librasqal1 and installing librasqal2.
I should clarify. The problem is that the first solution proposed is not the upgrade. Rejecting that solution results in cupt properly choosing to auto-remove librasqal1, install librasqal2, and upgrade librdf0. This should likely be a higher priority than not upgrading, though. Adjusting severity accordingly. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <james...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
