Hi Patrik,

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:10:22PM +0100, Patrik Schindler wrote:
Am 30.11.2009 um 21:37 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:

Since you are already in touch with upstream developers, perhaps you know (or can ask) if a fix has been applied upstream too?


Yes:

Am 30.11.2009 um 20:09 schrieb didier:
Ok, I've commit it both in HEAD and 2.0 branch.

Excellent.  I'll try dig it out from their CVS then.


I would prefer to cherry-pick an "official" if possible.


That would be great! Do you think it will make it into lenny or may I expect to see this improvement in sid?

It will not reach Lenny officially, as it is not a security issue.

It will end in Sid (and eventually Squeeze too), and also in my unofficial SSL-enabled backports for i386 and amd64 through either one (and only one!) of these APT lines:

deb http://debian.jones.dk/ lenny netatalk
deb http://debian.jones.dk/ squeeze netatalk
deb http://debian.jones.dk/ sid netatalk


I might get around to compile for other archs too if you ask nicely. :-)


 - Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to