On lun., 2009-11-30 at 00:18 -0800, Jamie Zawinski wrote: > Your only proposal that would actually *work* is adding an option to > disable an important feature of xscreensaver.
Well, I fail to see in what it's problematic. The current situation (depending on the checkbox) is: - either you force DPMS settings and don't let anyone touch it - either you force DPMS settings and don't let anyone touch it I agree that, for users which need it, DPMS management by xscreensaver is ok (and nice), but I wonder in what “don't force any DPMS settings” is ”to disable an important feature of xscreensaver”. Maybe I didn't look at the code enough, but that's simply (or so to speak) a matter of not doing the DPMSSetTimeouts() call. (and again, one can imagine doing DPMSForceLevel() instead). Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
