Frank Küster <fr...@debian.org> wrote: > Marcin Juszkiewicz <mar...@juszkiewicz.com.pl> wrote: > >> Dnia wtorek, 24 listopada 2009 o 06:34:59 Norbert Preining napisał(a): >>> Ok, I found the bug ... >>> >>> from your fmtutil.cnf >>> >>> > # The following added lines have been transferred from >>> > # /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-base-bin.cnf >>> > #They take precedence over earlier entries >>> > etex pdftex language.def -translate-file=cp227.tcx >>> > *etex.ini pdfetex pdftex language.def >>> > -translate-file=cp227.tcx *pdfetex.ini ### End of file: >>> > /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-base.cnf >>> >>> Did *you* add this lines???
It seems that it's not a bug in our old transitioning code, but indeed has been added by "something". At least that's not a line that existed in 10texlive-base-bin.cnf. > When did 10texlive-base-bin.cnf disappear? It exists in TL2005, now in oldstable, and is already gone in stable. Since Debian generally doesn't support upgrades over two stable releases, I suggest that we simply remove the transitioning code right now. I've done that in the repository; I left the resurrection of modes.mf in there, since we still get bugreports from time to time. Although it's somehow bizarre: This problem affected only sid users (at least that's the comment in the code), and *everyone* should have gotten a new package since then with a postinst that tries to use modes.mf. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
