On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:53:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Should libgeda-common and geda-symbols be combined? Both are essential
> to any geda-gaf installation, from the same source, and now with the same
> version coherency requirements.
> 
> If so I think it makes sense to combine them into libgeda-common and
> obselete geda-symbols.
---end quoted text---

Well, is it worth the headache of removing geda-symbols & providing the 
proper Provides/Replaces/...  fields ?

-- 
 ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
  Digital design engineer
 GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to