On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:53:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Should libgeda-common and geda-symbols be combined? Both are essential > to any geda-gaf installation, from the same source, and now with the same > version coherency requirements. > > If so I think it makes sense to combine them into libgeda-common and > obselete geda-symbols. ---end quoted text---
Well, is it worth the headache of removing geda-symbols & providing the proper Provides/Replaces/... fields ? -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net) GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org