On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:24:29AM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:54 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Should that be solved by adding something like the following in
> > Depends ?
> >
> > geda-symbols (<< 1.{major_release+1}~)
>
>
> I'm not sure, but I suspect that my "dist upgrade" issues might be
> related to geda-symbols.
>
> gEDA 1.6.0 symbols will not work with any older versions of libgeda, so
> I added a conflicts between them. (The latest libgeda adds support for
> some new syntax in the symbol file, and some symbols use it.)
>
> This may have been what caused apt-get to require a dist-upgrade, the
> fact that it explicitly had to de-install the old libgeda, perhaps
> before it wanted to.
Should libgeda-common and geda-symbols be combined? Both are essential
to any geda-gaf installation, from the same source, and now with the same
version coherency requirements.
If so I think it makes sense to combine them into libgeda-common and
obselete geda-symbols.
Hamish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
